I've spent the last three months watching a peculiar form of professional anxiety spread through LinkedIn.

The narrative goes like this: AI will eliminate middle management. Marketing managers — the people who coordinate teams, translate strategy into execution, and keep campaigns running — are supposedly first on the chopping block. The robots are coming for the coordinators.

This is wrong. Not slightly wrong. Fundamentally wrong.

The data tells a different story. And if you lead a small marketing team, understanding that story is the difference between spending the next two years in career anxiety or spending them building an unassailable position.

The Misread

The extinction narrative makes a critical error: it confuses task execution with orchestration.

Yes, AI is eliminating tasks. It's writing first drafts. It's generating ad variations. It's pulling reports that used to take hours. McKinsey's analysis suggests that 30% of hours worked across the economy could be automated by 2030 - with marketing among the most affected functions.

But here's what the doomsayers miss: someone still needs to decide which tasks to automate. Someone needs to evaluate which AI outputs are garbage and which are gold. Someone needs to build the systems that connect AI tools into coherent workflows.

That someone is you.

The marketing managers I've observed thriving right now share one trait: they've stopped thinking of themselves as task supervisors and started thinking of themselves as systems architects.

The Orchestrator Framework

I use a simple mental model to explain this shift. Call it the Orchestrator Framework.

Traditional marketing managers operated at Level 1: Task Coordination. You assigned work, reviewed work, and reported on work. Your value was keeping the machine running.

AI has compressed Level 1 dramatically. The machine runs itself for many routine tasks. If your entire value proposition is "I make sure things get done," you have a problem.

But there are two levels above that most managers haven't claimed:

Level 2: Systems Architecture. You design workflows that multiply your team's output. You decide which AI tools to integrate, how they connect, and what quality gates they pass through. You build the machine instead of just operating it.

Level 3: Strategic Translation. You translate business objectives into marketing systems. You're the bridge between what leadership wants (revenue, leads, market share) and what your AI-powered team can deliver. You make the machine work on the right problems.

The managers getting eliminated are stuck at Level 1. The managers becoming indispensable have moved to Levels 2 and 3.

Why Small Team Leaders Have the Advantage

Here's the part that should encourage you if you run a small marketing team.

Large marketing departments have layers. They have specialists who only do one thing. They have middle managers whose entire job is coordinating other middle managers. When AI compresses task work, these structures become bloated and slow.

Small teams don't have that problem. Your content person also runs email. Your paid ads person also handles analytics. You, as the leader, already touch every function.

This means you can build integrated AI systems faster. You don't need to coordinate across six departments to connect your content workflow to your distribution workflow. You can do it in an afternoon.

The companies I've watched move fastest on AI implementation aren't the ones with the biggest marketing budgets. They're the ones with small, cross-functional teams led by someone who understands the entire marketing function.

A 4-person team with an orchestrator mindset will outproduce a 12-person team with a task-supervision mindset. Every time.

The Mindset Shift

If you manage a marketing team right now, here's the reframe I'd suggest:

Stop asking: "How do I protect my job from AI?"
Start asking: "How do I become the person who makes AI work for this company?"

That means spending less time reviewing task output and more time designing systems. It means evaluating AI tools not by their features, but by how they integrate into your workflows. It means positioning yourself to leadership as the person who can 3x output without 3x headcount. And it means building documentation and processes that make your AI systems repeatable.

The marketing managers who will thrive in 2026 and beyond are the ones building this positioning now.

Where This Leads

Within 18 months, I expect most SMB marketing teams to operate with one senior orchestrator (the marketing manager), one or two junior executors who manage AI tools, and a stack of AI systems doing the heavy lifting.

The orchestrator will be more valuable than ever. They'll command higher salaries. They'll have more leverage. They'll be the most important hire a growing company makes.

But only if they claim that role now.

The extinction narrative is a story scared people tell each other. The real story is opportunity — if you're willing to build for it.

by SP
for the AdAI Ed. Team

Reply

or to participate

Keep Reading

No posts found