Your team ran ChatGPT. The draft came back in 90 seconds.
Then someone had to spend 3 hours rewriting it because it read like a press release from 2003.
AI was supposed to save time. Instead, it created a new job: fixing robot garbage before anyone sees it.
Our team tested 47 content frameworks over six months. We tracked hours saved, edits required, and whether the output actually shipped. Most frameworks failed. Five passed.
These five quality standards solve the delegation problem. They let you hand work to AI without becoming the rewrite department.
How We Tested
We gave the same brief to five team members using different quality frameworks. Each brief had a specific output requirement: blog post, LinkedIn post, email sequence, ad copy, or sales page.
We measured:
Time to first draft
Edits required before shipping
Whether it passed brand voice review
Whether it actually got published (or died in revisions)
The frameworks that passed all four checks made this list.
What Made These Five Different
Most quality frameworks focus on detecting AI slop after it's written. These five prevent it during creation.
They give you criteria you can hand to your team before they write. That means fewer rewrites, faster shipping, and content that sounds like your brand instead of every other company using the same prompt.
What you're about to get:
All 5 quality standards with implementation checklists
When to use each one (and when to skip)
Real output examples showing before/after
Specific prompts that enforce each standard
We tested 47 frameworks. These 5 let you delegate without becoming the rewrite department.
Let’s go…
